Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Affirmative Action :: Quotas Race Minority Academics Essays
Affirmative Action In Texas, acceptance to public universities for high school bookmans is now based on academic achievement - if a student is at the top ten percent of his or her class, he or she will be automatically accepted. This is a way to counter the unfairness of affirmative action causes because the admission has nonhing to do with race or sex. Arguably, this policy is reasonable because students studying at the uniform high school receive equal opportunity to learn and educate themselves. This may seem fair, but the same problem still exists. If a student has to work part-time just to make a living because his or her family is unable to sustain financially, how is this student going to find time to study and be successful in school, and therefore, be in the top ten percent?In recent supreme court ruling, the point dust that were using in admitting law students at the University of Michigan was ruled unconstitutional and therefore taken out. The university used a point sy stem that quantified the qualification of the applicants status. If a students points exceed a certain be, he or she is admitted to the school. The university gives an extra twenty points to the minorities in terms of enforcing affirmative action and table serviceing the disadvantaged. The six of the judge believe that the defined number system is in many ways similar as having a set quota in admitting minority students, which was banned in the case of University of California v. Bakke of 1978. The judges believe that having a rule in admitting students strictly by race is impersonal. In Bakkes case, the University defends itself for having such quota with the fact that admitting minority students into aesculapian school can help improve social discrimination because the minority are less likely to have the education or the financial status to go to a medical school. As a result, being a doctor becomes majority profession. The judges at the time countered the universitys statemen ts by stating that the school is being unfair to the non-minority applicants, who are not directly responsible of the social discrimination. The Supreme Court ruled the University of Michigans point system unconstitutional in the undergraduate level, but kept the same system for the Law school. They believe race should be taken into consideration, but should not quantify qualification. Although the judges opposing this ruling stated that A fixed quantitative score for racial minority status has the virtue of honesty.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.